An Independent bid?

Hagel

UPDATE: Jan 28th– see below

C-Span interviewed Republican Senator Chuck Hagel (R-NE) this past weekend on Newsmakers and Hagel did not hide from the idea that he could run as an Independent.

What does it do if he enters as an “I”? Will there be a Perot-effect?

Sticking by his anti-war stance, he made some strong statements today against the Bush Iraq plan at the Senate Foreign Relations Committee:

We better be damn sure we know what we’re doing, all of us, before we put 22,000 more Americans into that grinder.

It seems that Hagel has been planning this for an extended period of time positioning himself for an Independent bid for the White House.

UPDATE: JAN 28TH

Excellent piece today in Newsweek on Hagel and the possibility of him running in ’08. He clearly dismisses the idea of running as an independent:

Hagel’s speech at the Foreign Relations Committee last week earned him new fans on the left, some of whom are hoping he’ll run for the White House as an independent—a notion he dismisses as ludicrous. He chafes when it’s suggested he could run as an “antiwar candidate,” and thinks he’s earned the right to define himself. “I’ve always said you’d better listen to the guys who’ve had the experience of having to actually carry the rifle,” he says, “and see the tragedy of war … Down in the mud, having to face the fact his buddy’s brains are next to him because his head’s been shot off.” Hagel speaks these words with sadness. He walks the halls of the Senate with a gray melancholy that makes some who know him wonder if he has the fight in him for a long-shot presidential run. But Hagel is an old soldier who has fought without question before. The wound on his face was born in a flash of fire.

One other quote, which I think embodies why a lot of us on the progressive side of the aisle would like to see Hagel run:

That intensity was on display last Wednesday as he sat and stewed at a hearing of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. The panel was considering a resolution condemning President Bush’s proposal to send 21,000 additional troops to Iraq; Hagel, a cosponsor of the resolution, would be the only Republican on the committee to vote for its passage. As he listened to his colleagues make their cases for and against the president’s plan, Hagel told NEWSWEEK he noticed something missing: an acknowledgment that the Senate was talking about committing real troops, the men and women whose “fighting and dying” make a war. He had no prepared text but the words came easily as he took his turn at the mike. Calling Iraq the country’s most divisive issue since Vietnam, he dared his fellow committee members to take a stand. “I think all 100 senators ought to be on the line on this,” he said. “If you wanted a safe job, go sell shoes.” For a moment, his colleagues were silent and stunned. Later that afternoon, Joe Biden, the committee’s Democratic chairman, complimented him on his performance. “I’ve rarely seen such a powerful connection between the heart and the mind,” Biden said. “That was deep in you.”

Advertisements

2 Responses to An Independent bid?

  1. anoodle says:

    Wow, would that be interesting. Actually, he would make a great VP candidate on the dem side if he’d consider it.

    So, let’s game this out a bit…. who would he take votes from? Let’s assume that the other Republican candidate is a pro-war Hawk, like McCain. Whoever the democratic candidate is, whether it’s HRC, Obama, or Edwards, they will obviously be to the left of McCain. Will they be to the left of Hagel?

    I think he is an interesting candidate because he can pull votes from both sides. If the Republican candidate is someone soft on the socially conservative issues, like for instance Romney or Giuliani, I would guess that he could pull votes from the true blue conservatives who are not foreign policy neo-cons. The traditional, more nationalistic, America-first types who are socially conservative.

    The biggest problem (like any independent) he would have would be fundraising. With the frontrunners likely to raise over 150 million before we even hit Iowa, I’m not sure anyone not independently wealthy can come up with that kind of cash….

    I love the idea of this because I think it focuses the debate where it needs to be……

  2. comm5ttee says:

    I’m really wondering about a Hagel candidacy from the center. To me it seems like a substantial uphill battle for him. However, I’m unsure if it would be impossible. Right now, there are over a hundred blogs and websites drafting a Hagel in 2008 bid. He might power through on the Dean (and proposed Gore) Internet wave.

    The basics though are that the Hagel candidacy would be beneficial to Democrats. Let’s face it, no matter how he positions himelf, he is unlikely to gain votes from the Dem nominee, even if it is HRC and her divisiveness. However, although he is socially conservative, he has said repeatedly that he is open to change, and is anti-war.

    Regardless, the ultimate challenge is to the GOP. I don’t think he has the effect of siphoning votes as this commentator would have you believe to spark the debate.

    It could be fun and great for democracy to have a viable 3rd party candidate.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: